What the heck, that means the school isn’t paying enough to live on.
So, getting drunk after work with their colleagues and superiors is not a misconduct and it’s seen as “networking” and “team building” but having a side job during a weekend, to help with the monthly expenses in a time where everything is expensive but the salaries are the same or lower is a misconduct…
> Presumably, the logic is that the employer wants the worker to focus all of their energy on their primary job, viewing a side gig as something that will cut into the focus and recovery time necessary to keep them working in peak condition, or they worry that their customers/users will see things that way and perceive allowing workers to have second jobs as a lack of commitment to providing the optimum quality.
Assuming this news article is real, then this information is so incorrect
Where Article 38 prohibits public servants from engaging in additional paid work. There were also past reports of a fireman who ran a gaming YouTube channel, and a police officer who worked as a prostitute
Stupid law, yes, but that is the reason why he got in trouble.
Public servants like teachers cannot hold two jobs by law… the school did what they had to. A few years ago a fireman lost his job for having a small paying youtube channel
5 comments
Kafka would be proud.
What the heck, that means the school isn’t paying enough to live on.
So, getting drunk after work with their colleagues and superiors is not a misconduct and it’s seen as “networking” and “team building” but having a side job during a weekend, to help with the monthly expenses in a time where everything is expensive but the salaries are the same or lower is a misconduct…
> Presumably, the logic is that the employer wants the worker to focus all of their energy on their primary job, viewing a side gig as something that will cut into the focus and recovery time necessary to keep them working in peak condition, or they worry that their customers/users will see things that way and perceive allowing workers to have second jobs as a lack of commitment to providing the optimum quality.
Assuming this news article is real, then this information is so incorrect
The reason why this teacher got in trouble was due to the local public servant act (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/325AC0000000261)
Where Article 38 prohibits public servants from engaging in additional paid work. There were also past reports of a fireman who ran a gaming YouTube channel, and a police officer who worked as a prostitute
Stupid law, yes, but that is the reason why he got in trouble.
Public servants like teachers cannot hold two jobs by law… the school did what they had to. A few years ago a fireman lost his job for having a small paying youtube channel