[Editorial by Morley Robertson] Is Japan’s right-wing populism a collection of “oshikatsu” activities?

The recent House of Councillors election in Japan highlighted the emergence of a unique form of populism, which could be described as “ambitionless fascism.” This involves extreme statements, once confined to controversial online forums, being openly expressed in national political discourse. However, many who listen to such ideas are not overtly malicious in everyday life. Instead, these “good people” resonate with these ideas due to underlying anxieties and insecurities they can’t manage.

Unlike the energetic and ambitious MAGA movement in the United States—rooted in religious communities and anti-elite sentiments with charismatic leaders—Japan’s version lacks a similar drive. Both countries share prolonged economic uncertainties, but Japan also faces factors like social isolation and diminished community ties. Simple, extreme messages on smartphone screens may appear as “salvation” amidst these conditions.

With the decline of communal activities like local festivals, Japan has shifted towards a survival-based, competitive individualism. Success stories of luxury cars and high-rise apartments dominate, implying that failure is a personal responsibility. Faced with unrewarded efforts and societal injustices, many protect their self-esteem by adopting an attitude of resignation.

While the MAGA community openly strives to overturn the status quo, Japan’s right-wing populism currently seems more like a collection of personal advocacies without the collective drive for change. If exclusionary and discriminatory rhetoric stems from feelings of inadequacy and unfulfillment rather than aggression, what might truly be needed are safety nets to address loneliness and establish supportive networks for vulnerability.

Furthermore, if economic uncertainty is a major concern, criticism might be more appropriately directed at capitalist structures and tax policies favoring capitalists, rather than minorities. Taking from minorities does not create value or benefit anyone. If the perspective is that eliminating the “other” is acceptable despite growing poverty, then there might be little room left for discussion.