This is just stupid. There are billions of web pages, and a permission first approach to access public works that are copyrighted is just not feasible and it will ultimately only benefit larger AI companies with the money to license such sites. I would much rather see an ad sharing revenue model between the LLM and content website as opposed outright licensing for content like we see in movie and show streaming.
I know there’s strong anti-AI sentiment but I have to agree that the AI isn’t breaking copyright law. It knows language, it reads publicly available information, and then it knows the information and can answer questions about it. It’s the same as a person reading an article and answering questions about it.
2 comments
This is just stupid. There are billions of web pages, and a permission first approach to access public works that are copyrighted is just not feasible and it will ultimately only benefit larger AI companies with the money to license such sites. I would much rather see an ad sharing revenue model between the LLM and content website as opposed outright licensing for content like we see in movie and show streaming.
I know there’s strong anti-AI sentiment but I have to agree that the AI isn’t breaking copyright law. It knows language, it reads publicly available information, and then it knows the information and can answer questions about it. It’s the same as a person reading an article and answering questions about it.
Comments are closed.