30 days.
They said Tokyo, Kanazawa, Kyoto, Osaka, Fuji is enough,
because you are "always in a rush" and you don't want to move from a lot of places, you'd rather stay in one and do day trips (like osaka->nara, osaka->kobe) or even osaka->hiroshima for a long day trip.
But here I see people do TWICE as much places than me in 30 days or even less…
are my friends just lazy? they told me they did only Tokyo, Fuji and Osaka (with day trips to kyoto!) and they said it was enough places to stay at bc of how "rush-y" this whole trip is… they said "you will be walking a LOT in tokyo, walking a lot in osaka…" so staying 2 nights in Kanazawa, or an overnight in Nikko.. just seems exhausting.. all the drives.. unpacking.. walking etc…
are they overreacting? is it that bad that instead of doing like… 10 days in tokyo, ill do 7 days and move 3 days to Kyushu or something? and instead of 10 days in osaka.. i'll do 5 osaka 5 in somewhere else?
or they are correct and it will be exhausting all these transition? thanks!
by ConversationKey5296